Equal time again. Since I covered Amazon’s new cheap tablet and Apple’s latest releases, it’s only fair that I do the same for the new toys Google announced this morning.
The new phones are the Nexus 6P and Nexus 5X. (Disclosure: My current phone is a Nexus 5.)
The 6P has, unsurprisingly, an approximately 6 inch screen; the screen is a hair larger than an iPhone 6’s screen, even though the phone itself is a tad smaller. It’s got the “best camera ever,” fingerprint recognition for authentication, and front-facing stereo speakers.
The 5X is, as best I can tell, the 6P, but with a smaller screen and slightly less powerful processor.
Incremental improvements. Am I going to trade in my Nexus 5? Nah. If I was looking to upgrade my phone, I’d give the 5X a close look, but I don’t see enough of an improvement to make me retire the 5–although, given my ongoing complaints about the quality of the photos I post on Fridays, that “best camera ever” sounds attractive. I’ll be keeping an eye on the hands-on reviews once the phones get into consumer’s hands. That’ll be in October.
Moving on to Marshmallow, we heard about most of the new features back in May, so there weren’t a whole lot of surprises. Simplified, more granular permissions should good, as does 30% longer battery life thanks to the “Doze” mode. One surprise was the extension of voice recognition to third-party apps. We’ve been able to launch apps by voice for a while, but now the apps will be able to implement internal voice controls. Given the interpretation time, I wouldn’t expect more than a few controlled choices (“Do you want to resume the video where you left off or start over?”) but it could help with hands-free operation; don’t forget that Google is pushing Android into the automotive space. Marshmallow will start rolling out next week–to the Nexus 5, 2013 Nexus 7, and Nexus 9. It won’t be released for the original 2012 Nexus 7.
On the software side, we’ve got family plans for Google Music, enhanced sharing and album management for Google Photos, and new services coming to Chromecast, including Showtime, Sling TV, and Spotify.
And, to take advantage of the new services, there are two new Chromecasts. One is an enhanced version of the original, with faster Wi-Fi support (including the 5GHz band), a built-in HDMI cable, and bright, shiny colors. The other is an audio-only model, intended for connecting your streaming music–including Google Music, naturally–to your existing audio system. There’s no HDMI output, just digital optical and headphone outputs. Both are available today at the same $35 price the original Chromecast sold for.
The audio Chromecast seems like an interesting idea–a convenient way to get your music onto better speakers than a typical monophonic Bluetooth one without having to route the sound through a TV. If the Wi-Fi is really solid, this could give you a significant fraction of the Sonos feature set for a small piece of the price. Don’t forget to add in the cost of a digital audio cable when you do your price-to-performance calculation, though!
And then there’s the Pixel C. Windows laptop/tablet combination devices are popular at the moment. Blame Microsoft Surface for starting the trend. Apple is onboard: the iPad Pro is the iOS equivalent. And now Google is going there.
Ten inch screen, 2560×1800 touchscreen, running Android (not stated, but presumably Marshmallow). Cool feature: there’s no physical connection between the tablet and the keyboard. They’re held together with magnets in open, closed, and stand-up positions–and the keyboard charges inductively when they’re touching.
You can buy the tablet without the keyboard. So think of this as the new Nexus 10. $499-$599 depending on memory, plus $149 for the keyboard. So that’s $200-$300 cheaper than the iPad Pro (although without the
stylusApple Pencil). Still significantly more expensive than a standard Windows 10 convertible device, but you always pay a premium for “cool,” right? No firm date for availability, but Google promises it’ll be out in time for Christmas. Give one to all your loved ones!
By the way, from the photos, it looks like the keyboard uses the same layout as Chromebooks. Personally, I find the omission of “Home” and “End” keys extremely annoying on my Chromebook. But then, I write novels. Maybe they’re not necessary for the e-mails that Google talks about.
I worry a little about that inductive charging. That’s not hugely efficient. I’m concerned about how hard the tablet’s runtime will be affected. Again, we’ll have to wait for the reviews.
Bottom line: Google’s got some incremental improvements coming our way, but nothing really earth-shattering. The Chromecast Audio is, I think, the most intriguing thing in the pipeline.
This is extremely interesting, because *just this morning* I started looking at the 5X and the 6P, because I had a problem over the weekend where I couldn’t get my Nexus 4 to turn on. (One of my friends got it to work, so it’s OK for now, but I’m concerned about its lifespan.) The 6P is *larger* than an iPhone 6? My goodness! I think the 5X is about the same size as my Nexus 4. But you say that, for the extra ~$130 you pay for the 6P, you get “a smaller screen and slightly less powerful processor.” “Slightly” less powerful? It’s 2GB vs. 3, or a factor of 50%. That’s the one thing that’s making me think of actually paying the extra money for the 6P.
OK, I’m talking about RAM and you’re talking about the actual processor, which is, admittedly, only slightly less powerful. But don’t you think the difference in RAM is really significant? (And if you want people not to complain about your photos, you have to use a *camera.*)
And in retrospect, I should have pointed out that the 5X starts at 16GB of storage vs. 32GB for the 6P. I still do fine with 16, but I know a lot of people are finding it increasingly cramped.
Agreed about the camera, but I’m not going to carry a camera with me all the time in hopes of getting a shot of Sachiko doing something cute. I do take my phone everywhere. I don’t expect great photos, but an incremental improvement, especially if I was replacing the phone anyway, would be nice.
No, the 6P’s screen is slightly larger than the iPhone 6’s screen, but the entire phone is a tad smaller. Mind you, we’re talking less than a quarter of an inch in both cases (and this is based on the dimensions shown in one slide from the announcement, so I can’t speak to weight).
See, I *do* carry a small camera everywhere in hopes of taking a picture of something cute.
Cheater! Don’t you know that multipurpose gadgets are the Wave of the Future?
Neiner-neiner–mine has optical zoom.